Worth Remembering
There's no guarantee an appeal will change the outcome — but that doesn't mean it isn't worth understanding your options.
A Thrive Claims specialist will personally review your answers and call you. There is no cost or obligation. Prefer to talk now? Call 1300 059 888.
Your guide
Plain-English information, reviewed by the Thrive Claims team. This guide explains how TPD claims are assessed, what insurers actually look at, and the circumstances that may be relevant to your own situation.
Depending on the circumstances, there may be a review, reconsideration or dispute pathway available after a TPD claim has been rejected. A rejection shouldn't automatically be treated as the end of the matter.
Prefer to talk?
Call1300 059 888There's no guarantee an appeal will change the outcome — but that doesn't mean it isn't worth understanding your options.
The appropriate pathway depends on the policy, the decision that was made, the circumstances of the claim, and the applicable dispute process. There's no single answer that applies to every claim.
A TPD claim appeal generally refers to challenging or seeking review of a decision about a TPD claim. The process can involve examining:
The exact process varies depending on the circumstances.
The reason for the original rejection is important — it determines what the review actually needs to address.
Evidence relevant to an appeal can include medical records, specialist reports, GP records, treatment history, prognosis, employment information, work history, functional capacity information, policy documents, previous claim correspondence, and the original decision. The relevant evidence depends on the reason for the original decision. See TPD Medical Evidence →
No. The value of evidence depends on its relevance to the issues that need to be addressed — a large volume of documents isn't automatically more persuasive than a smaller amount of relevant information. The important question is whether the available evidence addresses the matters relevant to the applicable policy and the reasons for the decision.
Medical evidence may need to address issues such as diagnosis, severity, treatment, prognosis, symptoms, restrictions, functional capacity, work capacity and permanence. The evidence that matters depends on the policy and the reasons for rejection.
Working doesn't automatically prevent a TPD claim, but employment can be relevant to the assessment of work capacity.
This can be an important policy question. Different TPD definitions assess work capacity differently — some focus on a person's own occupation, while others consider broader work capacity. The relevant wording needs to be understood before assuming what "able to work" actually means for a particular claim.
Occupation can be relevant to the applicable TPD definition. A person's ability to perform a particular role can involve physical, cognitive, psychological and practical requirements — the significance of occupation depends on the policy.
Potentially. Many TPD policies are held through superannuation, and the applicable review or dispute pathway will depend on the circumstances. If your TPD claim through super has been rejected, understanding the decision and the applicable pathway is genuinely important. See TPD Insurance Through Superannuation →
There's no single universal timeframe that applies to every TPD appeal. The relevant timeframe can depend on the type of decision, the insurer, the super fund, the applicable dispute process, the policy and the circumstances. If you've received a rejection, it's sensible to act promptly and establish what timeframe applies. See TPD Claim Timeframes →
There's no guarantee that an appeal will result in a different outcome.
An appeal or review of an existing decision isn't necessarily the same thing as making a new claim. The appropriate option depends on what has happened to the original claim, and the applicable policy and dispute arrangements — it's important to understand the status of your original claim before assuming that submitting a completely new claim is the correct approach.
Yes, a TPD decision involving a mental health condition can potentially be reviewed or challenged where an applicable pathway exists — including depression, PTSD, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder and eating disorders. The relevant question isn't simply whether a diagnosis exists, but how the condition and supporting evidence relate to the applicable TPD definition.
The same broad principle applies. TPD claims can involve chronic back pain, spinal injuries, cancer, heart conditions, stroke, neurological conditions, chronic pain, autoimmune conditions, sensory loss and physical injury — the relevant policy and circumstances determine what evidence and issues need to be considered.
Multiple conditions can contribute to a person's overall inability to work. Where several conditions are relevant, the overall functional impact may be important to understanding the circumstances of the claim — particularly where individual conditions interact or compound each other. See TPD Multiple Conditions →
If a review doesn't change the decision, there may or may not be further options depending on the circumstances. The applicable dispute pathway should be understood before deciding what to do next.
Related claim areas: our services, TPD claims, superannuation claims, income protection claims, multiple super funds claims, mental health claims, physical injury and illness claims, TPD claims for DSP recipients, TPD claims for NDIS participants, and TPD claims for motor accident claimants.
Considering a review after a refusal means first understanding the decision you are challenging. With TPD claims, the policy wording, reasons and supporting evidence can shape what needs to be addressed. For insurance attached to a fund, superannuation claims may involve issues that need to be distinguished from Income Protection claims, while policies across multiple super funds should not be assumed to share the same outcome. The review may concern how a mental health condition or a physical injury or illness affects the work you can sustain. Existing assessments associated with DSP support or NDIS participation may be relevant to discuss, but a different decision-making system does not automatically settle the insurance dispute. Likewise, work incapacity following a motor vehicle accident needs to be considered against the cover and evidence. Through our claims services, Thrive Claims can help you explore the claim's broader context while recognising that the available review pathway and any deadlines depend on your particular circumstances.
Explore Thrive Claims
Whatever your circumstances, Thrive Claims supports a wide range of claim types across every Australian state and territory. Explore all services →
TPD CLAIMS SUPPORT
Guide library
20 pages of plain English resource library covering evidence, timeframes, payouts and appeals.
Conditions we help with
TPD claims can arise from many different illnesses and injuries. Explore by category below.
Common questions
Straight answers about TPD claim appeal, written in plain English.
Know where you stand
Your first conversation is free, confidential and comes with no obligation.
Call1300 059 888